Trust page

Methodology

How the site handles current rules, source freshness, and route promotion discipline.

Quick answer

This site checks current official MSFH pages first, shows the source stack on each route, and stays narrow when the rule support is weak or stale.

What not to assume

  • Do not assume old PDFs outrank current support articles.
  • Do not assume a held route should auto-promote because it exists.
  • Do not assume stale source support is safe enough for expansion.

Newer official pages and support articles win. Older PDFs are background only.

Every route keeps the official sources that support it, plus a review date so stale pages can be caught quickly.

If the rule support is unclear or stale, the page should stay narrow or hold back instead of expanding claims.

Program rules are kept separate from contractor and quote guidance so the site does not imply approval.

Support-state pages stay cautious because portal language can change faster than project rules.

Why this page is careful

Built from current official pages, then narrowed to one safer next step

  • Fresh rules first: current official pages beat stale PDFs and old flyers.
  • One page, one question: each page should solve one homeowner decision cleanly.
  • Risk check: when scope is fuzzy, the page slows the decision down instead of pushing a sale.

What this page is not

Independent guidance, not official approval

This page is an independent guide. It is not the program, not a government office, and not legal, insurance, or contractor advice.

Last reviewed against the source stack: 2026-04-13

Official source stack

Current official sources behind this page

MSFH Support Center hub

Operational source of truth for post-report confusion states.

Verified 2026-04-13 - Next scheduled review 2026-05-13

Consumer alert on imposters

Confirms scam risk and why non-affiliation language must stay visible.

Verified 2026-04-13 - Next scheduled review 2026-05-28